This is the first part in a series on the Indian telecom sector's ongoing court cases in the 2G spectrum scam.
The article below is taken from a website called 2gscam.co.in and I am not immediately able to make up my mind about whether the contents are farily reliable or accurate. Nevertheless, the article taken from the website and presented below seems to prima-facie provide fairly insightful analysis of one aspect of the scam.
Here is the article:
http://www.2gscam.co.in/the-indian-telecom-sector.asp
The Indian Telecom Sector – Was it Ever 'Clean'?
Telecom  scams are not new. In August 1996, the CBI registered  an FIR against former  telecom minister Sukh Ram after recovering 3.62  crore from his residences in Delhi and Himachal Pradesh  .
Thirteen  years later, in 2009, he was sentenced to three years  of rigorous imprisonment  for “criminal conspiracy” and spent time  behind bars for a month before being  released on bail. 
A point to note here,  is that unlike the case of Sukh Ram, who  was released on bail, inspite of being  sentenced, in the the current  situation, the ‘accused’ are not being released on bail ,even  though they have not been proven ‘guilty’.
During  the BJP led NDA government, there  was a major controversy when telecom companies were allowed to move from a  licensing regime to a revenue-sharing one.
In  July 1999, following the recommendation of a Group of  Ministers headed by  Jaswant Singh, the fixed licence fee regime was  changed to a revenue share one.  This was adversely commented on by the  CAG. 
According  to Ratan Tata, if a hypothetical   amount was to be calculated at that point of time, the loss to the  exchequer  would be about Rs. 50,000 crore.
Other  ministers for communications during the NDA regime, including the late Pramod Mahajan, were accused of  assisting Reliance Infocomm  to  become a nationwide operator offering “full mobility” in its  cellular phone  operations without paying the full licence fee. This  decision of the DoTwas  against TRAI recommendations and the resultant  loss to the exchequer was said to be in the region of 1,100 crore.
Now : Over to the 2G Spectrum Scam. What is it in a nutshell?
                      The accusation by CBI is that       millions of dollars were paid in bribes to ensure favors for       certain firms in 2007-08 when the Telecom Ministry issued       122 new licenses to offer mobile phone services in the       world’s fastest growing telecom market.
                      Raja claimed he was following       precedents as well as policy guidelines that had been put in       place by the earlier Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP)-led      National Democratic Alliance (NDA) government and       that he was adhering to the laws of the land.
                      Also, it is relevant to note that       there is communication on record between him & the Prime       Minister - Mr. Manmohan Singh, that proves that the       Government was indeed aware & had also given him the go       ahead to allocate licenses in a First Come First Serve       manner. Even Mr. Chidambaram & Mr. Pranab Mukerjee       were all aware of the same, as some communication material       proves.
                      Shockingly, now, that this       allocation basis of 2G spectrum has become controversial,       the Congress is passing the buck to the DMK.
                      First Steps being taken towards       Unearthing the Actual 2G Scam:
                      Five months into the preliminary       inquiry (PE) relating to the allocation of 2G spectrum       during 2001-07, finally, the Central Bureau of Investigation       is now scrutinising documents, looking at the telecom policy       and how the policy was implemented by successive Telecom       Ministers during that time.
                      While 42 licences, including for       basic services and Unified Access Service (UAS), were issued       during 2001, as many as 51 licences were given during       2004-06. Telecom Ministers during 2001-07 were the late       Pramod Mahajan and Arun Shourie during the NDA regime and       Dayanidhi Maran and Mr. Raja were in charge of the Telecom       portfolio from 2004 onwards when the Congress-led United       Progressive Alliance assumed power.
What are the charges levied by CAG on the Telecom Ministry?
The CAG has contended that
(a) by underpricing second generation (2G) spectrum,
(b) By allowing companies to use two competing technologies — the global system of mobile (GSM) communications and the Code Division Multiple Access (CDMA) technology — using the same license and
(c) By allocating more spectrum to companies than what their licenses specified, the total loss to the country could be as much as Rs. 30,984.55 crore.
(a) by underpricing second generation (2G) spectrum,
(b) By allowing companies to use two competing technologies — the global system of mobile (GSM) communications and the Code Division Multiple Access (CDMA) technology — using the same license and
(c) By allocating more spectrum to companies than what their licenses specified, the total loss to the country could be as much as Rs. 30,984.55 crore.
A tabular listing of all the companies involved in the loss to the country of Rs 30,984.55 crore as per CAG & CBI:
| Company | Licenses Issued1 | Share(Rs. in Crores) | % Share | Named in Charge-sheet | 
| Tata | 3 CDMA; 19 GSM (Dual) | 4,930.66 | 15% | NO | 
| Unitech Wireless | 22 GSM | 4,441.05 | 14% | Yes | 
| Datacom | 21 GSM | 4,239.19 | 14% | NO | 
| Loop | 21 GSM | 4,239.19 | 14% | NO | 
| Reliance | 14 GSM (Dual) | 3,379.58 | 11% | NO | 
| Shyam | 21 CDMA; 1 GSM (Dual) | 2,650.03 | 9% | NO | 
| Swan | 13 GSM | 2,624.26 | 8% | Yes | 
| Idea | 9 GSM | 1,816.80 | 6% | NO | 
| S-Tel | 6 GSM | 1,211.20 | 4% | NO | 
| Spice | 4 GSM | 807.46 | 3% | NO | 
| Allianz | 2 GSM | 403.73 | 1% | NO | 
| HFCL | 1 GSM (Dual) | 241.40 | 1% | NO | 
| Total Amount (Rs./Crores) | 30,984.552 | 100% | ||
1Source: As per CAG Report 2010, DoT  issued 122 New Licenses and 35  Dual Technology Licenses in 2008. Number  of licenses are also mentioned in CBI  1st Chargesheet of 2.4.2011 on  Page 56 and Page 42.  
 2Source: CBI 1st  Chargesheet of 2.4.2011 (Page 60): New  Licenses (Rs.22,535.6 crs) +  Dual Technology Licenses (Rs.8,448.95 crs) = Total  Amount (Rs.30,984.55  crs). CDMA license entitles 2.5MHz spectrum and GSM  license entitles  4.4MHz spectrum. Amount of New Licenses (Rs.22,535.6 crs) and  Dual  Technology Licenses (Rs.8,448.95 crs) divided among companies in   proportion of their spectrum entitlement based on number of licenses  issued to  them.
Unfortunately,  due to the selective wheels of justice, it is a fact that:
Percentage share of Companies charge-sheeted – 22%
Percentage share of Companies not charge-sheeted – 78%
Percentage share of Companies charge-sheeted – 22%
Percentage share of Companies not charge-sheeted – 78%
When will  the rest of the companies get chargesheeted? Or, are they going to get away  scot free now?
Icing on the Cake: Additional Spectrum Scam Involving the Existing Operators in 2007 which is being ignored Thus Far:
                      The CAG has also revealed  that spectrum was  provided in addition of the contracted 6.2 megahertz (MHZ) to  nine  existing operators in 2007 inspite of the fact that a number of   applications were pending for new licenses. 
                      These existing operators   were Aircel, Bharti, BPL (Mumbai), the public sector undertakings Bharat   Sanchar Nigam Ltd (BSNL) and Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Ltd (MTNL),  Idea,  Reliance, Spice (Punjab) and Vodafone.
                      The biggest beneficiary of   additional spectrum was BSNL (61.6 MHZ in 19 telecom circles) followed  by  Bharti (32.4 MHZ in 13 circles), Vodafone (19.6 MHZ in seven  circles), Idea  (12.6 MHZ in six circles), MTNL (124 MHZ in Delhi and  Mumbai circles) and others. 
                      Note: The total loss to  the exchequer on account of allocation of additional spectrum at low prices: Rs. 36,993 crore!!!
                      So, when will  these existing operator companies get chargesheeted by CBI? 
...................
No comments:
Post a Comment